Appendix-23-The Government Employees Conduct Rules 1996, Ques-Ans

In the Appendix-23 of Punjab Civil Services Rule Volume I Part 2 is Appendix-23-The Government Employees Conduct Rules 1996. Here are Important Questions Answers of this Chapters.

Table of Contents

Appendix-23

PUNJAB GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ((CONDUCT)) RULES1966

Ques 2301 Please state whether Punjab Govt. Employee ((Conduct)) Rules1966, are applicable of ALL INDIA SERVICE/IPS Officers working under the Punjab Govt.

Ans 2301 Vide proviso (a) to rule 1(3) of the Punjab Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules1966, these rules are not applicable to ALL INDIA SERVICE/IPS Officers working under the Punjab Govt.

Ques 2302 A Govt. employee was transferred temporarily to Govt. of India. Please state whether Pb. Govt. employees (Conduct) Rules, 1966, are applicable or not during the period of temporary transfer?

Ans 2302 Vide proviso (c) to rule 1(3) of the Punjab Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules 1966, the employee during his temporary transfer will be governed by the corresponding rules to the Govt. of India, during the period of his temporary transfer.

Ques 2303 A Punjab Govt. employee was sent on deputation to Chandigarh U.T.Govt. Please state whether (Conduct) rules of Chandigarh. U.T.Govt. or Pb.Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules,1966, will be applicable to him during the period of deputation?

Ans 2303 Vide proviso (c) to rule 1(3) of the Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules1966, during the period of deputation the corresponding Conduct Rules of Chandigarh. U.T.Govt. will be applicable.

Ques 2304  A Punjab Govt. officer was sent on deputation to PRTC Patiala. Please state whether Pb. Govt. Employees (Conduct) rules, 1966,, or PRTC Employees Conduct Rules will be applicable to him during the period of deputation?

Ans 2304  Pb. Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules1966 will be applicable to officer during the period of deputation to PRTC vide explanation below rule 2(b) of the Rules.

Ques 2305 Who is the Competent Authority to grant permission to class III employees under the Pb. Govt. employees (Conduct) Rules,1966?

Ans 2305  Vide rule 2(d)(iii) of the Punjab Govt Employees (Conduct) Rules 1960, Head of Office is the Competent Authority to grant permission to class III employees under the Pb Govt. Employers (conduct) Rules.

Ques 2306 A Punjab Govt. officer was sent on deputation to PRTC Patiala. He wants to purchase a second-hand car, whose sanction will be required under the Conduct Rules?

Ans 2306 Vide rule 2(d)(b) of the Punjab Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules.1966, sanction of the Parent Department on the cadre of which the employee is borne will be required in this case.

Ques 2307 A supervisory officer claimed that he is honest and devotes full time to his duty but his subordinates are lazy and corrupt. Comments?

Ans 2307 The claim of the officer is against the provisions of rule 3(2)(1) of the Punjab Govt Employees (Conduct) Rules 1966 vide which it is the duty of the supervisory officer to take all possible steps to ensure the integrity and devotion of duties of all employees under his control and authority.

Ques 2308 A Head of Deptt. while on tour issued oral directions to his district officer. The District Officer carried out the directions and sent a communication to the Head of Deptt. to confirm his oral directions. The Head of Deptt. wrote back that there was no need for confirmation in writing of his oral directions while on tour. Comments?(SAS9/89)

Ans 2308 The action of the Head of Deptt. is against the provision of rule 3(2)(ii) of the Punjab Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules1966, vide which written confirmation of the oral directions is required to be sent by him as soon as possible.

Ques 2309 A Head of Deptt. on a visit to a district asked his District Officer orally to transfer a particular employee. The District Officer did not comply with oral orders. The Head of Deptt. instituted/started departmental action against the District Officer. Comments?

Ans 2309 The action of the Head of Deptt. in initiating the departmental action against the District Officer for non-compliance of oral directions regarding transfer is against the provision of explanation II below rule 3(2) of the Punjab Govt. Employee (Conduct) Rules, 1966.

Ques 2310 An officer of the Industry Department used his influence to secure employment of his son in an industry in Punjab. Comments?

Ans 2310 The action of the officer is against the provision of rule 4(1) of the Punjab Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules,1966, vide which no employee can use his influence or position to secure employment for any member of his family in any company or industry.

Ques 2311 A dependent brother of a class-I officer accepted employment in a company with which his brother has official dealings, Comments?

Ans 2311 The action of the officer is against the provision of rule 4(2)(1) of the Punjab Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules,1966, vide which he should have not permitted his brother to accept employment without obtaining prior permission of the Govt. or should have accepted employment provisionally subject to the Govt. permission vide proviso below the rule.

Leave a Comment